Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Although deductive reasoning is a closed system, one's beliefs about the world can influence validity judgements. To understand the associated functional neuroanatomy of this belief-bias we studied 14 volunteers using event-related fMRI, as they performed reasoning tasks under neutral, facilitatory and inhibitory belief conditions. We found evidence for the engagement of a left temporal lobe system during belief-based reasoning and a bilateral parietal lobe system during belief-neutral reasoning. Activation of right lateral prefrontal cortex was evident when subjects inhibited a prepotent response associated with belief-bias and correctly completed a logical task, a finding consistent with its putative role in cognitive monitoring. By contrast, when logical reasoning was overcome by belief-bias, there was engagement of ventral medial prefrontal cortex, a region implicated in affective processing. This latter involvement suggests that belief-bias effects in reasoning may be mediated through an influence of emotional processes on reasoning.
منابع مشابه
Explaining 'Explaining Away'
Explaining away is a common pattern of reasoning in which the connrma-tion of one cause of an observed or believed event reduces the need to invoke alternative causes. The opposite of explaining away also can occur, in which the connrmation of one cause increases belief in another. We provide a general qualitative probabilistic analysis of intercausal reasoning, and identify the property of the...
متن کاملQualitative Propagation and Scenario-based Explanation of Probabilistic Reasoning
Comprehensible explanations of probabilistic reasoning are a prerequisite for wider acceptance of Bayesian methods in expert systems and decision support systems. A study of human reasoning under uncertainty suggests two different strategies for explaining probabilistic reasoning: The first, qualitative belief propagation, traces the qualitative effect of evidence through a belief network from ...
متن کاملRepresentational and executive selection resources in 'theory of mind': evidence from compromised belief-desire reasoning in old age.
Effective belief-desire reasoning requires both specialized representational capacities-the capacity to represent the mental states as such-as well as executive selection processes for accurate performance on tasks requiring the prediction and explanation of the actions of social agents. Compromised belief-desire reasoning in a given population may reflect failures in either or both of these sy...
متن کاملScientific Reasoning and Belief Structure
For explaining theory change, it is important to be able to express which theory is believed to be fundamental and which theory is thought to be true. To achieve this expressive power, I propose theory of belief structures (TBS) that describes belief states not in terms of a set of sentences but by a structure. The dominant formal approach of belief revision, the AGM theory, adopts a conservati...
متن کاملModulation of Reasoning Bias and Brain Activation by Serotonin Transporter Genotype and Emotional Content
Reasoning often occurs under emotionally charged, opinion-laden circumstances. The belief-bias effect indexes the extent to which reasoning is based upon beliefs rather than logical structure. We hypothesized that emotional content will increase this effect, particularly for individuals with higher emotional reactivity. The serotonin transporter genotype is associated with emotional reactivity ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Cognition
دوره 87 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003